Guides & Advice

The Dangers of Joint Property

Published: 3rd February 2021
Area: For the individual

“How is your joint property held” is a question we ask every client undertaking estate planning or making a will.

The answer can potentially have very significant consequences, particularly where the family home is the main asset.

For some, the ability to hold property as either joint tenants or tenants in common may be very familiar concepts. For others, the decision of how to hold the family home has often been made many years ago or was not something ever actively considered.

Other clients have undertaken estate planning many years ago, which resulted in their property being held as tenants as common. However, when the couple have moved, the new property has inadvertently been purchased as joint tenants, potentially undermining any estate planning they have put in place.

Where property is held as joint tenants, on the death of one owner, the property passes automatically to the other, regardless of the provisions of that person’s will.

But in contrast, where property is held as tenants on common, when one person dies, the share belonging to them passes in accordance with the terms of their will.

Many family homes are held as joint tenants, as this is often seen as the “default” for married couples and although this may work well for many people, it is not always the best option.

Considerations for the future

Consider a second marriage, where the first to die wishes to protect their share of the property for the children of previous relationships. If the home is held as joint tenants, the surviving spouse has complete control after the first death – they could give the property away or they could leave it in their Will to their own children or to a new spouse if they remarry. If they die without a Will, the laws of intestacy will decide who will inherit this on their death and this will not include step-children.

The possible unintended consequences of holding a property as joint tenants are clearly demonstrated by a recent case where a married couple were both found dead at their home. It was unclear who had died first and each had a daughter from a previous relationship.

The couple held their home (and their bank account) as joint tenants, meaning that whoever died second would inherit the other’s share.

Where it cannot be determined who has died first, the law considers this to have been the older person, in this case the husband. As a result of this, the wife was deemed hold all the assets at her death and her daughter inherited everything. The husband’s daughter inherited nothing. Had the property been held as tenants in common instead, each daughter would have received half.

How it affects estate planning

Holding property as tenants in common can also sometimes be useful even where the ultimate intended beneficiaries are the same for each joint owner.

Many people choose to include Nil Rate Band Trusts in their Wills on the first death, not least because this allows up to £325,000 to be held outside the Estate of the survivor, providing protection of this sum from care fees. If the main asset is the family home, it is often necessary to ensure that the share belonging to the first to die passes under their Will in order to have enough value to make full use of this Trust. This will not happen where property is held as joint tenants.

These are the key features of joint tenants vs tenants in common but whether they are pros or cons can be subjective and frequently depends on individual circumstances. It’s important to obtain legal advice before committing to one option over another so that you know that you’re making the right choice for you and your family.

Contact us

For further information contact Kathleen Ryan or another member of the private client team in your local office.

From inspirational SHMA Talks to informative webinars, we also have lots of educational and entertaining content for life and business. Visit SHMA® ON DEMAND.

Our free legal helpline offers bespoke guidance for any queries on family and private matters. We also have a team of experts on hand for a range of subjects, from employment and general business matters through to director’s responsibilities, insolvency, restructuring, funding and disputes. Available from 10am-12pm Monday to Friday, call 0800 689 4064.

How can we help?

Our expert lawyers are ready to help you with a wide range of legal services, use the search below or call us on: 0330 024 0333

SHMA® ON DEMAND

Listen to our SHMA® ON DEMAND content covering a broad range of topics to help support you and your business.

Charities: Defending 1975 Act claims in a pandemic – do charities have “needs”?

18 May

Andrew Wilkinson, Partner | Alistair Spencer, Associate
Charities: Defending 1975 Act claims in a pandemic – do charities have “needs”?

Has the current Covid context led to charities being in greater need and altered […]

Employment Tribunal: Top tips and tactics for the Education sector

20 May

David Browne, Partner | Esther Maxwell, Legal Director
Employment Tribunal: Top tips and tactics for the Education sector

This stimulating and highly practical discussion will cover the top tips that institutions need […]

Employment: Post-pandemic working arrangements

27 May

Michael Hibbs, Partner | Lubna Laheria, Solicitor
Employment: Post-pandemic working arrangements

What will working arrangements look like in a post-pandemic future? We look at the […]

Intellectual Property: Judgement update: Claydon Yield-O-Meter v Mzuri – prior use and patent validity

9 Jun

Daniel Kelly, Solicitor
Intellectual Property: Judgement update: Claydon Yield-O-Meter v Mzuri – prior use and patent validity

The webinar will also contain some practical tips for both inventors and challengers to […]

Later Living: Build to Rent & Retirement Living

27 Apr

Louise Drew, Partner & Head of Building Communities
Later Living: Build to Rent & Retirement Living

Our panel discusses the differences and synergies between the markets and lessons that can […]

Agriculture: Partnership Agreements

22 Apr

Peter Snodgrass, Partner & Head of Agriculture | Jennie Wheildon, Legal Director
Agriculture: Partnership Agreements

This bite size webinar is intended help you firstly identify a partnership and then […]

Fire and Re-hire – the controversy and the law

21 Apr

Matt McDonald, Partner
Fire and Re-hire – the controversy and the law

So why is fire and re-hire controversial, and what do employers need to consider […]

National Design Code: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

24 Mar

Richard Cooke, Associate Director | David Pendle, Planning Director
National Design Code: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Design is currently a hot topic of debate, with the Government consulting on a […]

Our Latest Thoughts

All the latest views and insights on current topics.

Garraway’s digital legacy challenges are a lesson to us all

30 Apr

For the individual

Garraway’s digital legacy challenges are a lesson to us all

Read article Right Arrow

The importance of a Lasting Power of Attorney

30 Mar

For the individual

The importance of a Lasting Power of Attorney

Read article Right Arrow

Your guide to recovery and resilience

23 Mar

Corporate & Commercial

Your guide to recovery and resilience

Read article Right Arrow

Legacy loop: spring edition 2021

5 Mar

For the individual

Legacy loop: spring edition 2021

Read article Right Arrow

Can you remove an executor from a will?

4 Mar

For the individual

Can you remove an executor from a will?

Read article Right Arrow