Published
27th October 2025

Contents

Summarise Blog

Richard Taylor wins defamation case over portrayal in The Lost King

We are delighted to act for Richard Taylor, former Deputy Registrar at the University of Leicester, in his successful defamation claim against actor Steve Coogan and Pathé Productions following their portrayal of him in the 2022 film The Lost King.

The film, which tells the story of the discovery of King Richard III’s remains beneath a Leicester car park in 2012, presented events through the perspective of amateur historian Philippa Langley. Richard argued that his depiction in the film was false and damaging, wrongly suggesting that he had misrepresented facts, marginalised Ms Langley’s contribution, and behaved in a dismissive and misogynistic way.

On Monday 27 October 2025, the case concluded with a significant outcome in Richard’s favour. A statement was made in open court, the film will be amended, and the defamatory allegations will not be repeated.

A “defamation David and Goliath moment”

Daniel Jennings, who led the legal case and represented Mr Taylor, said, “This is a defamation David and Goliath moment and confirms what Mr Taylor has always believed: that his portrayal in The Lost King was damaging, harmful and untrue. Individuals often feel unable to speak up against large corporations and well-known personalities, but this win demonstrates that there is recourse when wrongs have been committed.”

He continued:

“We live in an era of documentaries, podcasts and very public investigative journalism, and there’s a growing trend for film and television productions to be labelled as ‘true accounts’ to attract audiences and generate media attention. Mr Taylor’s win should serve as a clear warning for anyone taking that approach. The law is unambiguous, and there are defined routes to compensation for individuals who find themselves misrepresented.”

“It’s been a long battle for Mr Taylor which has ended successfully, however it’s hard to ignore that the shine has been taken off what should have been a moment of celebration for one of the country’s greatest archaeological discoveries. The way Mr Taylor was portrayed was defamatory, and the court’s order recognises this in favour of the individual — in what could be the first of many defamation rulings if our appetite for ‘true accounts’ continues to grow.”

Judicial recognition

At the conclusion of the proceedings, the judge acknowledged the significance of the case, commenting that:

“These have been historical, momentous events, and being the subject of a feature film must be nerve-racking at the best of times. It is to the credit of the parties and their lawyers that the case has now been resolved in this way without going to trial.”

Protecting your reputation

At Shakespeare Martineau, we help individuals and organisations protect their reputations and respond swiftly and effectively to false or damaging allegations. Our defamation and reputation management team provides commercial, strategic advice to resolve disputes and safeguard public and professional standing.

If you believe you have been misrepresented in the media, on screen or online, our specialists can help.

Find out more about our defamation and reputation management services

Our latest litigation & dispute resolution content

What is a section 25 notice?

Landlord & Tenant Advice
read more >
Business Interruption Insurance | Our fixed fee support
Litigation & Dispute Resolution
read more >
Building Safety Act 2022: Tips for developers and freeholders
Property Disputes
read more >
Seven steps to handling a client insolvency
Corporate Restructuring & Insolvency
read more >

See more guides >

Our legal experts are here to answer any question you might have

If you’d like to speak to a member of our team, please fill out the form and we’ll be in touch within two hours.
If you know who you need to contact, you will find a full list of our people with email and telephone numbers here.
Call Us: 0330 024 0333

About the Author

Daniel is an experienced specialist commercial litigator, but also with experience as a company director to understand the demands and concerns of clients. That is used to analyse a problem; assess the options to find the most suitable option; and implement the plan to resolve the problem. He specialises in dealing with: • Disputes concerning companies and partnerships, including shareholder claims, derivative actions, partnership claims and all corporate matters. Daniel has recently appeared in the Court of Appeal successfully overturning a first instance decision in an unfair prejudice claim. • Warranty disputes. Daniel has recently acted in a claim surrounding…