Guides & Advice

What does the OfS’s new student protection condition mean for registered providers?

Published: 23rd April 2021
Area: Education

The OfS has introduced a new registration condition relating to student protection, designed to enable it to intervene more readily and effectively in cases where a provider is at material risk of closure and market exit. There has of course already been one example of large scale market exit in the case of Greenwich School of Management (GSM), but that had not made it on to the register by the time it went into administration. Nevertheless, one assumes that the OfS will have drawn on its experience of that case in developing the new registration condition.

What does the new condition say?

The new condition is engaged where the OfS reasonably considers that a provider (other than a FE college or designated institution in the FE sector) is at risk of fully or substantially ceasing to deliver higher education. If that is the case, then the OfS will require the provider to implement “student protection measures”. These are the measures that the OfS reasonably considers are proportionate steps to mitigate the risk to students of disorderly market exit and include:

 

  • teach out arrangements;
  • student transfers;
  • information and advice for students;
  • refunds and compensation arrangements; and
  • appropriate exit awards.

The OfS may allow the provider to develop its own student protection measures or may impose appropriate measures itself. It may also direct the provider to take, or refrain from taking, consequential or related action, for example in relation to the deployment of staff or the need to consult a registered insolvency practitioner.

In deciding if a provider is at material risk of market exit, the OfS will consider all the relevant facts, including whether there is evidence that a provider may not have access to sufficient funds to meet its day-to-day costs and any other liabilities due over a 12 month period. Where a provider’s ability to meet this test is based on it successfully securing additional borrowing or investment or restructuring the business or on the acts or decisions of a third party, the OfS will make a judgment about how likely these steps are to be delivered in practice.

The OfS will normally engage with and may consult with the provider before issuing student protection directions. It may also decide to order the provider to publish its market exit plan or the student protection measures it is putting in place, if it considers it necessary to do so to protect the interests of current and future students.

What are the implications of the new condition?

Providers who find themselves in financial difficulties can expect significant intervention by the OfS, including, it appears, some fairly granular directions around how they should operate. The condition allows the OfS to, in effect, second judge the provider’s governing body’s own judgments about its financial viability and sustainability. This may be a complicated assessment, especially for providers who are part of complex groups or have unusual ownership models.

Where the OfS determines that student protection directions are necessary, it has a broad discretion to determine what they should be, which leaves open the question of what happens if the provider disagrees. Although the Higher Education and Research Act provides specific mechanisms for providers to challenge enforcement action (such as a monetary penalty or deregistration) for breach of registration conditions, it does not stipulate any specific procedure for challenging the OfS’s judgments about action that falls short of enforcement action. Therefore, any challenge would likely be by way of judicial review, where the courts will generally defer to the judgment of the primary decision-maker in matters of substance. So providers may not have any meaningful route to challenge the OfS’s decisions either in relation to financial viability but also in relation to the specific steps the OfS requires them to take.

It is also not clear how the new registration condition will interact with other legal obligations that providers may be subject to. For example, in an insolvency situation, Will refunds and compensation to students be seen as preferring one set of creditors over others?  What might be the view of banks and lenders or suppliers of key services and goods to the fact that the provider has been made subject to such directions? Might they, for example, consider ceasing to provide credit, services or goods which in turn compound the provider’s difficulties? Might directors and trustees of providers be vulnerable to personal liability if they feel compelled to continue to trade or operate in a manner that is inconsistent with their duties to act in the best interests of their organisations?

For providers, the new condition reinforces the need to take timely, firm and measured action to ensure financial viability, including considering restructuring, turnaround measures, mergers and collaborations. However, the questions above highlight the very real challenges that the OfS will face in intervening to protect the interests of students in cases of provider vulnerability. Act too slowly and the damage will already be done. Act too early and the intervention may precipitate the very thing the condition is designed to avoid: a disorderly exit from the market.

We’re here to support you

Our education team is on hand if you have any questions so please do get in touch with Smita Jamdar if you have any concerns.

Our updated guide to recovery and resilience covers everything you need to navigate your organisation out of lockdown, unlock your potential and make way for a brighter future. Further advice in relation to COVID-19 can be found on our dedicated coronavirus resource hub.

From inspirational SHMA Talks to informative webinars, we also have lots of educational and entertaining content for life and business. Visit SHMA® ON DEMAND.

How can we help?

Our expert lawyers are ready to help you with a wide range of legal services, use the search below or call us on: 0330 024 0333

SHMA® ON DEMAND

Listen to our SHMA® ON DEMAND content covering a broad range of topics to help support you and your business.

Charities: Defending 1975 Act claims in a pandemic – do charities have “needs”?

18 May

Andrew Wilkinson, Partner | Alistair Spencer, Associate
Charities: Defending 1975 Act claims in a pandemic – do charities have “needs”?

Has the current Covid context led to charities being in greater need and altered […]

Employment Tribunal: Top tips and tactics for the Education sector

20 May

David Browne, Partner | Esther Maxwell, Legal Director
Employment Tribunal: Top tips and tactics for the Education sector

This stimulating and highly practical discussion will cover the top tips that institutions need […]

Later Living: Unlocking development potential for Retirement Living

26 May

Louise Drew, Partner & Head of Building Communities
Later Living: Unlocking development potential for Retirement Living

Our webinar will explore the typologies of housing available, the design, funding and planning […]

Employment: Post-pandemic working arrangements

27 May

Michael Hibbs, Partner | Lubna Laheria, Solicitor
Employment: Post-pandemic working arrangements

What will working arrangements look like in a post-pandemic future? We look at the […]

Later Living: Build to Rent & Retirement Living

27 Apr

Louise Drew, Partner & Head of Building Communities
Later Living: Build to Rent & Retirement Living

Our panel discusses the differences and synergies between the markets and lessons that can […]

Agriculture: Partnership Agreements

22 Apr

Peter Snodgrass, Partner & Head of Agriculture | Jennie Wheildon, Legal Director
Agriculture: Partnership Agreements

This bite size webinar is intended help you firstly identify a partnership and then […]

Fire and Re-hire – the controversy and the law

21 Apr

Matt McDonald, Partner
Fire and Re-hire – the controversy and the law

So why is fire and re-hire controversial, and what do employers need to consider […]

National Design Code: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

24 Mar

Richard Cooke, Associate Director | David Pendle, Planning Director
National Design Code: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Design is currently a hot topic of debate, with the Government consulting on a […]

Our Latest Thoughts

All the latest views and insights on current topics.

How can universities implement green goals to reach net zero emissions?

27 Apr

Education

How can universities implement green goals to reach net zero emissions?

Read article Right Arrow

Better together? The OIA’s new rules on large group complaints

24 Apr

Education

Better together? The OIA’s new rules on large group complaints

Read article Right Arrow

What does the OfS’s new student protection condition mean for registered providers?

23 Apr

Education

What does the OfS’s new student protection condition mean for registered providers?

Read article Right Arrow

Office for Students’ statement of expectations on harassment and sexual misconduct and what providers need to do

21 Apr

Education

Office for Students’ statement of expectations on harassment and sexual misconduct and what providers need to do

Read article Right Arrow

Government needs to make better decisions for universities and their students

14 Apr

Education

Government needs to make better decisions for universities and their students

Read article Right Arrow