Guides & Advice

Applying best practice during COVID-19 and managing employees who refuse to attend work

Published: 16th January 2021
Area: Corporate & Commercial

While many organisations have been required to close during this third period of lockdown, there are still a number of businesses that are allowed to remain open and are essential in keeping the country moving.

However, with coronavirus cases at an all-time high, there will be members of staff who refuse to attend work because they feel it is unsafe to do so.

Our blog on working from home - practical considerations may also be useful for employers who still have employees working remotely.

What can I do if an employee refuses to attend work due to COVID-19?

As a result of the government’s current guidance, employers should allow employees to work from home wherever possible. Where it is not possible for employees to work from home, an employer can require employees to attend the workplace once it has taken all reasonably practicable steps to reduce the risks of contracting coronavirus, such as sanitising workplaces and carrying out risk assessments.

Read our guide on keeping your employees safe in the workplace.

Employers should communicate clearly with employees about the measures that have been put in place in order to ease any concerns. If an employee continues to be reluctant to return to the workplace, an employer should explore their reasons.

We outline some common reasons why employees may refuse to return to work and how an employer can tackle them.

1. Shielding employees

If the government or NHS has advised the employee to shield, then it is very likely that they are suffering from a condition which will amount to a disability for the purposes of the Equality Act. They may have been issued with a letter from the NHS and employers can request a copy of this letter which will help to guide them in understanding the risk for that employee.

According to government guidance, employees who are shielding are eligible for furlough if they cannot work from home. While there is no legal requirement for an employer to agree to this, it is advisable to place them in furlough and, if necessary, make a claim under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. Please note, however, that if the employee is off sick and on statutory sick pay, it is not possible for them to be furloughed – they will need to be taken off statutory sick pay first.

Read our guide on making reasonable adjustments for employees with a disability during a global pandemic.

2. Using public transport

If an employee has concerns about using public transport to get to work, an employer should discuss with them if there are options to allow them to travel at a quieter time for example, by changing their start or leave time. Extra car parking spaces could be offered, where possible, so that the employee could avoid using public transport. However, this reason in itself will not justify the employee not coming into work.

3. Childcare arrangements

On 5 January 2021 guidance was updated to confirm that employees may be furloughed if they are unable to work, or are working reduced hours, because of caring responsibilities which have arisen as a result of COVID-19. If an employee is unable to return to work for this reason then an employer should explore other options, such as adjusting the employee's role to enable them to work from home, or putting them on furlough.

4. Living with a relative with health concerns

Here, the specific circumstances would need to be analysed to identify whether there is a risk of discrimination, or other risks, if the employee is treated detrimentally as a result of their desire to remain away from the workplace.

The law on associative discrimination does not protect the relative of a person with a protected characteristic against failure to make reasonable adjustments, discrimination arising from a disability or indirect discrimination. However, they are protected against direct discrimination, harassment and victimisation. As a result, reasonable steps should be taken to ensure that the employee does not suffer repercussions because of their association with someone who has a protected characteristic and falls within one of the vulnerable groups.

We would advise that the employer considers all possible options and a risk assessment is carried out in order that the employee feels comfortable to attend work.

When can an employer take disciplinary action?

Employees are protected from both detriment and dismissal for certain, protected health-and-safety-related conduct, including refusing to present for work in certain situations, and any such dismissal will be deemed automatically unfair.

Unlike claims for “ordinary” unfair dismissal, which have a two year qualifying service requirement, claims for automatically unfair dismissal and detriment are not subject to an employee having any minimum length of service. It is therefore important before considering disciplinary action, that an employer understands the employee’s reasoning for refusing to attend work.

However, if an employer has ensured that the safety of the employee is not at risk and after considering all factors, there is no valid reason why the employee is unable to attend work, any absence can be treated as unauthorised which will warrant disciplinary action which could include dismissal on the grounds of gross misconduct.

We’re here to help

If you’re considering disciplining or dismissing an employee for refusal to attend work and need some guidance or advice, speak to a member of your local employment team.

From inspirational SHMA Talks to informative webinars, we also have lots of educational and entertaining content for life and business. Visit SHMA® ON DEMAND.

Our free legal helpline offers bespoke guidance on a range of subjects, from employment and general business matters through to director’s responsibilities, insolvency, restructuring, funding and disputes. We also have a team of experts on hand for any queries on family and private matters too. Available from 10am-12pm Monday to Friday, call 0800 689 4064.

How can we help?

Our expert lawyers are ready to help you with a wide range of legal services, use the search below or call us on: 0330 024 0333

SHMA® ON DEMAND

Listen to our SHMA® ON DEMAND content covering a broad range of topics to help support you and your business.

Charities: Defending 1975 Act claims in a pandemic – do charities have “needs”?

18 May

Andrew Wilkinson, Partner | Alistair Spencer, Associate
Charities: Defending 1975 Act claims in a pandemic – do charities have “needs”?

Has the current Covid context led to charities being in greater need and altered […]

Employment Tribunal: Top tips and tactics for the Education sector

20 May

David Browne, Partner | Esther Maxwell, Legal Director
Employment Tribunal: Top tips and tactics for the Education sector

This stimulating and highly practical discussion will cover the top tips that institutions need […]

Later Living: Unlocking development potential for Retirement Living

26 May

Louise Drew, Partner & Head of Building Communities
Later Living: Unlocking development potential for Retirement Living

Our webinar will explore the typologies of housing available, the design, funding and planning […]

Employment: Post-pandemic working arrangements

27 May

Michael Hibbs, Partner | Lubna Laheria, Solicitor
Employment: Post-pandemic working arrangements

What will working arrangements look like in a post-pandemic future? We look at the […]

Later Living: Build to Rent & Retirement Living

27 Apr

Louise Drew, Partner & Head of Building Communities
Later Living: Build to Rent & Retirement Living

Our panel discusses the differences and synergies between the markets and lessons that can […]

Agriculture: Partnership Agreements

22 Apr

Peter Snodgrass, Partner & Head of Agriculture | Jennie Wheildon, Legal Director
Agriculture: Partnership Agreements

This bite size webinar is intended help you firstly identify a partnership and then […]

Fire and Re-hire – the controversy and the law

21 Apr

Matt McDonald, Partner
Fire and Re-hire – the controversy and the law

So why is fire and re-hire controversial, and what do employers need to consider […]

National Design Code: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

24 Mar

Richard Cooke, Associate Director | David Pendle, Planning Director
National Design Code: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Design is currently a hot topic of debate, with the Government consulting on a […]

Our Latest Thoughts

All the latest views and insights on current topics.

How do you deal with an unexpected resignation?

12 May

Employment

How do you deal with an unexpected resignation?

Read article Right Arrow

A note from the experts: navigating employment law

30 Apr

Corporate & Commercial

A note from the experts: navigating employment law

Read article Right Arrow

Vaccination policies: what the hospitality sector needs to know

28 Apr

Employment

Vaccination policies: what the hospitality sector needs to know

Read article Right Arrow

Prior use and patent validity – how far will the courts stretch the Hozelock decision?

27 Apr

Intellectual Property

Prior use and patent validity – how far will the courts stretch the Hozelock decision?

Read article Right Arrow

Better together? The OIA’s new rules on large group complaints

24 Apr

Education

Better together? The OIA’s new rules on large group complaints

Read article Right Arrow