A sigh of relief for landlords and letting agents everywhere – as you were

Blog | Landlord and Tenant
Published: 28th January 2022
Area: Real Estate & Planning

Share This

26 January 2022 saw the Court of Appeal hand down the judgment in the case of Northwood Solihull v Fearn & Ors (2022) EWCA Civ 40, which could have had a major impact on landlords and letting agents.

The Court of Appeal ruled that any authorised employee of a landlord or a letting agent can sign a Section 8 Notice or a prescribed information tenancy deposit certificate and did not have to comply with the requirements of Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006.

Background to the case

In 2019, Mr Fern and Ms Cooke (the tenants) were served a Section 8 Notice (the notice) after they fell in to rent arrears. The notice was signed by the property manager of Northwood Solihull, who was acting in the normal course of her duties as she was employed by the landlord.

The claim for possession was defended and the basis of their defence was that the notice was invalid. They argued that as the landlord was a corporate body and in order for them to rely on the notice it needed to be signed in accordance with Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006.

Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006, sets out that a limited company may execute a document either by affixing its common seal, or by a director of the company signing the document in the presence of a witness or by two authorised signatories.

The tenants  brought a counterclaim relating to the prescribed information certificates for the security deposit, which was only signed by one director of the landlord and without a witness signature, whereas in their view it needed to be signed by landlord.

At the possession hearing, the trial judge granted the landlord an order for possession. However, the judge did uphold the tenant’s counterclaim that the prescribed information did need to be executed in accordance with s.44.

The landlord’s positon was that even if the prescribed information did have a second signature on it, it did not have any impact on the tenant’s position.

The tenants appealed against the trial judge’s findings in relation to the notice and the appeal was dismissed. However, the landlord was granted permission to cross-appeal in relation the tenants counterclaim on the prescribed information.

The Court of Appeal’s decision

The Court of Appeal looked at the issue of the prescribed information certificate and the notice.

The certificate

The Court of Appeal agreed with the landlord’s position with regards to the signature of the certificate.

They held, “if an authorised and authenticated certificate, containing all the information is given to the tenant, I cannot see that any harm has been done”

The certificate was signed by the property manager who was authorised to do so on behalf of the landlord.

The Section 8 Notice

With regards to the notice, the Court of Appeal held “it was signed by an agent in the manner permitted by both the primary legislation and Regulations”.

The notice was signed by the director of Northwood Solihull, who was an agent of the landlord.

Furthermore, the Court of Appeal also considered the implications of non-compliance for both the certificate and notice and it was held that non-compliance would not invalidate the documents.

The Court of Appeal decision is a very welcome one for landlords and agents. Had the judgment not gone in the favour of the landlord, it would have had a detrimental impact on any notices served and prescribed information certificates, which would have been signed on behalf of the landlord.

The decision means that landlords and letting agents can continue in the way they have been doing so, provided that all the required information is provided to tenants on a notice and the prescribed information certificates.

Contact us

For information contact Habib Khan in our housing management team, who can guide, help support you and your teams to deal with any housing management and litigation issues you face during these evolving times.

Get In Contact

Habib is part of the social housing litigation team. He engages with all stakeholders to ensure landlords and property managers achieve their goals for their housing stock.

Landlord & Tenant Advice

We focus on giving you clarity and a clear decision making path. Our team’s pragmatic and commercially-focused advice is always there when you need it.

Our Thoughts

All the latest thoughts and insights from our team

Long COVID and disability discrimination

4 Jul

Corporate & Commercial

Long COVID and disability discrimination

The employment tribunal has determined that an employee was disabled for the purposes of […]

Read article Right Arrow

Six things for Indian businesses to consider before expanding to the UK

4 Jul

Corporate & Commercial

Six things for Indian businesses to consider before expanding to the UK

According to the UK’s Department for International Trade the proposed trade arrangement between India […]

Read article Right Arrow

SHMA® On Demand

All the latest on-demand content

Agriculture: diversifying or leasing your land to create habitat banks

6 Jul

Peter Snodgrass, Partner & Head of Agriculture

Agriculture: diversifying or leasing your land to create habitat banks

We know that biodiversity net gains provide a significant opportunity for landowners to diversify […]

Register Right Arrow

Teachers’ Pension Scheme – strategic issues independent schools need to think about

20 Jul

Esther Maxwell, Legal Director | Emma Glazzard, Solicitor

Teachers’ Pension Scheme – strategic issues independent schools need to think about

Webinar Teachers’ Pension Scheme – strategic issues independent schools need to think about In […]

Register Right Arrow